First plural (inclusive) pronoun
source: entry from Holle List; unable to verify c. 1900 note: I am not sure whether this Holle entry is erroneous. There is considerable semantic drift among pronouns an various remote locations. Interestingly, this does not seem to cause problems. The pronouns as I present them include kam as exclusive, and that also agrees with Collins, 1981. My pronoun presentation seems to be the most widespread usage, although this is harder to quantify than it might seem, as people tend to use pronouns a certain way but then get confused when they are asked to think about and report how they are using them. Also compounding the confusion: an exclusivity contrast does not commonly exist in practice, and that tends to confuse speakers when asked to report correct usage. This phenomenon is similar to asking most English speakers to explain correct usage of thou, thee, and thine (or even whom for that matter).